Information on Result #590764
There is no linear OOA(3229, 293, F3, 5, 148) (dual of [(293, 5), 1236, 149]-NRT-code), because 3 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3229, 293, F3, 2, 148) (dual of [(293, 2), 357, 149]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3228, 293, F3, 147) (dual of [293, 65, 148]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(381, 145, S3, 49), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 5454 903125 674302 038138 022709 253118 870603 680604 996309 484668 631548 163854 828465 899522 845238 627953 731491 227462 708997 548509 054594 512076 840977 032054 473727 036116 069732 583516 742090 980902 781249 742853 019393 892253 960097 248495 972677 421373 426141 628074 366647 / 12 085062 732503 338992 176763 549129 519718 479110 268997 150451 737221 775723 050593 147904 271161 753240 445212 100862 734331 956180 467283 411940 172483 857447 041584 506698 884680 282731 811631 103778 314212 762058 997686 304963 565740 > 381 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(381, 145, S3, 49), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.