Information on Result #592775
There is no linear OOA(2168, 171, F2, 6, 88) (dual of [(171, 6), 858, 89]-NRT-code), because 4 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2168, 171, F2, 2, 88) (dual of [(171, 2), 174, 89]-NRT-code), but
- 8 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2160, 171, F2, 80) (dual of [171, 11, 81]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(280, 90, F2, 40) (dual of [90, 10, 41]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(240, 49, F2, 20) (dual of [49, 9, 21]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(280, 90, F2, 40) (dual of [90, 10, 41]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.