Information on Result #593107
There is no linear OOA(2189, 233, F2, 6, 91) (dual of [(233, 6), 1209, 92]-NRT-code), because 4 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2189, 233, F2, 2, 91) (dual of [(233, 2), 277, 92]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2188, 233, F2, 90) (dual of [233, 45, 91]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(298, 142, S2, 45), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(297, 141, S2, 44), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 33406 063517 297373 977917 219831 876457 216369 229824 / 189199 322419 332537 > 297 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(297, 141, S2, 44), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(298, 142, S2, 45), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.