Information on Result #596935
There is no linear OOA(2138, 176, F2, 8, 67) (dual of [(176, 8), 1270, 68]-NRT-code), because 6 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2138, 176, F2, 2, 67) (dual of [(176, 2), 214, 68]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2137, 176, F2, 66) (dual of [176, 39, 67]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(271, 109, S2, 33), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(270, 108, S2, 32), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 4 297708 243581 570312 211812 843520 / 3462 071301 > 270 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(270, 108, S2, 32), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(271, 109, S2, 33), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.