Information on Result #597909
There is no linear OOA(2202, 229, F2, 8, 99) (dual of [(229, 8), 1630, 100]-NRT-code), because 6 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2202, 229, F2, 2, 99) (dual of [(229, 2), 256, 100]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2201, 229, F2, 98) (dual of [229, 28, 99]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(2103, 130, S2, 49), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(2102, 129, S2, 48), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 4505 293676 588367 515344 369298 908326 658048 / 781 535645 > 2102 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(2102, 129, S2, 48), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(2103, 130, S2, 49), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.