Information on Result #610364

Linear OA(3110, 112, F3, 83) (dual of [112, 2, 84]-code), using repeating each code word 28 times based on linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(3110, 112, F3, 82) (dual of [112, 2, 83]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(3110, 112, F3, 81) (dual of [112, 2, 82]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(3110, 112, F3, 80) (dual of [112, 2, 81]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(3110, 112, F3, 79) (dual of [112, 2, 80]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(3110, 112, F3, 78) (dual of [112, 2, 79]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(3109, 111, F3, 82) (dual of [111, 2, 83]-code) [i]Truncation
7Linear OA(3108, 110, F3, 81) (dual of [110, 2, 82]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(3107, 109, F3, 80) (dual of [109, 2, 81]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(3105, 107, F3, 78) (dual of [107, 2, 79]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(3104, 106, F3, 77) (dual of [106, 2, 78]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(3103, 105, F3, 76) (dual of [105, 2, 77]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(3101, 103, F3, 74) (dual of [103, 2, 75]-code) [i]
13Linear OA(3100, 102, F3, 73) (dual of [102, 2, 74]-code) [i]
14Linear OA(399, 101, F3, 72) (dual of [101, 2, 73]-code) [i]
15Linear OA(397, 99, F3, 70) (dual of [99, 2, 71]-code) [i]
16Linear OA(396, 98, F3, 69) (dual of [98, 2, 70]-code) [i]
17Linear OA(395, 97, F3, 68) (dual of [97, 2, 69]-code) [i]
18Linear OA(393, 95, F3, 66) (dual of [95, 2, 67]-code) [i]
19Linear OA(392, 94, F3, 65) (dual of [94, 2, 66]-code) [i]
20Linear OA(391, 93, F3, 64) (dual of [93, 2, 65]-code) [i]
21Linear OOA(3110, 56, F3, 2, 83) (dual of [(56, 2), 2, 84]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding