Information on Result #610370

Linear OA(386, 88, F3, 65) (dual of [88, 2, 66]-code), using repeating each code word 22 times based on linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(386, 88, F3, 64) (dual of [88, 2, 65]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(386, 88, F3, 63) (dual of [88, 2, 64]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(386, 88, F3, 62) (dual of [88, 2, 63]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(386, 88, F3, 61) (dual of [88, 2, 62]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(385, 87, F3, 64) (dual of [87, 2, 65]-code) [i]Truncation
6Linear OA(384, 86, F3, 63) (dual of [86, 2, 64]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(383, 85, F3, 62) (dual of [85, 2, 63]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(381, 83, F3, 60) (dual of [83, 2, 61]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(380, 82, F3, 59) (dual of [82, 2, 60]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(379, 81, F3, 58) (dual of [81, 2, 59]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(377, 79, F3, 56) (dual of [79, 2, 57]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(376, 78, F3, 55) (dual of [78, 2, 56]-code) [i]
13Linear OA(375, 77, F3, 54) (dual of [77, 2, 55]-code) [i]
14Linear OA(373, 75, F3, 52) (dual of [75, 2, 53]-code) [i]
15Linear OA(372, 74, F3, 51) (dual of [74, 2, 52]-code) [i]
16Linear OOA(386, 44, F3, 2, 65) (dual of [(44, 2), 2, 66]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding