Information on Result #610373

Linear OA(374, 76, F3, 56) (dual of [76, 2, 57]-code), using repeating each code word 19 times based on linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(374, 76, F3, 55) (dual of [76, 2, 56]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(374, 76, F3, 54) (dual of [76, 2, 55]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(374, 76, F3, 53) (dual of [76, 2, 54]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(373, 75, F3, 55) (dual of [75, 2, 56]-code) [i]Truncation
5Linear OA(372, 74, F3, 54) (dual of [74, 2, 55]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(371, 73, F3, 53) (dual of [73, 2, 54]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(369, 71, F3, 51) (dual of [71, 2, 52]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(368, 70, F3, 50) (dual of [70, 2, 51]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(367, 69, F3, 49) (dual of [69, 2, 50]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(365, 67, F3, 47) (dual of [67, 2, 48]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(364, 66, F3, 46) (dual of [66, 2, 47]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(363, 65, F3, 45) (dual of [65, 2, 46]-code) [i]
13Linear OOA(374, 38, F3, 2, 56) (dual of [(38, 2), 2, 57]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding