Information on Result #621675
Linear OA(235, 46, F2, 15) (dual of [46, 11, 16]-code), using construction XX applied toC2 ⊂ C1 ⊂ C0 based on
- linear OA(226, 31, F2, 15) (dual of [31, 5, 16]-code), using code C2 for u = 5 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(221, 31, F2, 11) (dual of [31, 10, 12]-code), using code C1 for u = 5 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(216, 31, F2, 7) (dual of [31, 15, 8]-code), using code C0 for u = 5 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(25, 11, F2, 3) (dual of [11, 6, 4]-code or 11-cap in PG(4,2)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25, 16, F2, 3) (dual of [16, 11, 4]-code or 16-cap in PG(4,2)), using
- linear OA(23, 4, F2, 3) (dual of [4, 1, 4]-code or 4-arc in PG(2,2) or 4-cap in PG(2,2)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 4 [i]
- caps in base b = 2 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.