Information on Result #621751
Linear OA(2151, 168, F2, 63) (dual of [168, 17, 64]-code), using construction X applied to C3 ⊂ C1 based on
- linear OA(2120, 127, F2, 63) (dual of [127, 7, 64]-code), using code C3 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(2106, 127, F2, 47) (dual of [127, 21, 48]-code), using code C1 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(231, 41, F2, 15) (dual of [41, 10, 16]-code), using
- construction X applied to C2 ⊂ C1 [i] based on
- linear OA(226, 31, F2, 15) (dual of [31, 5, 16]-code), using code C2 for u = 5 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(221, 31, F2, 11) (dual of [31, 10, 12]-code), using code C1 for u = 5 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(25, 10, F2, 3) (dual of [10, 5, 4]-code or 10-cap in PG(4,2)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25, 16, F2, 3) (dual of [16, 11, 4]-code or 16-cap in PG(4,2)), using
- construction X applied to C2 ⊂ C1 [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.