Information on Result #621807
Linear OA(2145, 168, F2, 49) (dual of [168, 23, 50]-code), using construction XX applied toC3 ⊂ C1 ⊂ C0 based on
- linear OA(2120, 127, F2, 63) (dual of [127, 7, 64]-code), using code C3 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(2106, 127, F2, 47) (dual of [127, 21, 48]-code), using code C1 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(299, 127, F2, 31) (dual of [127, 28, 32]-code), using code C0 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(21, 17, F2, 1) (dual of [17, 16, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(222, 24, F2, 15) (dual of [24, 2, 16]-code), using
- repeating each code word 8 times [i] based on linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s (see above)
- repeating each code word 8 times [i] based on linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.