Information on Result #621831
Linear OA(2146, 170, F2, 51) (dual of [170, 24, 52]-code), using construction XX applied toC2 ⊂ C1 ⊂ C0 based on
- linear OA(2113, 127, F2, 55) (dual of [127, 14, 56]-code), using code C2 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(2106, 127, F2, 47) (dual of [127, 21, 48]-code), using code C1 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(299, 127, F2, 31) (dual of [127, 28, 32]-code), using code C0 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(25, 15, F2, 3) (dual of [15, 10, 4]-code or 15-cap in PG(4,2)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25, 16, F2, 3) (dual of [16, 11, 4]-code or 16-cap in PG(4,2)), using
- linear OA(225, 28, F2, 15) (dual of [28, 3, 16]-code), using
- repeating each code word 4 times [i] based on linear OA(24, 7, F2, 3) (dual of [7, 3, 4]-code or 7-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- Simplex code S(3,2) [i]
- repeating each code word 4 times [i] based on linear OA(24, 7, F2, 3) (dual of [7, 3, 4]-code or 7-cap in PG(3,2)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.