Information on Result #621895
Linear OA(2155, 184, F2, 50) (dual of [184, 29, 51]-code), using construction XX applied toD2 ⊂ D1 ⊂ D0 based on
- linear OA(2112, 127, F2, 54) (dual of [127, 15, 55]-code), using augmented code D2 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(2105, 127, F2, 46) (dual of [127, 22, 47]-code), using augmented code D1 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(298, 127, F2, 30) (dual of [127, 29, 31]-code), using augmented code D0 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(26, 20, F2, 3) (dual of [20, 14, 4]-code or 20-cap in PG(5,2)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(26, 32, F2, 3) (dual of [32, 26, 4]-code or 32-cap in PG(5,2)), using
- linear OA(230, 37, F2, 15) (dual of [37, 7, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(230, 39, F2, 15) (dual of [39, 9, 16]-code), using
- construction X applied to C2 ⊂ C1 [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(230, 39, F2, 15) (dual of [39, 9, 16]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.