Information on Result #621911
Linear OA(2141, 166, F2, 48) (dual of [166, 25, 49]-code), using construction XX applied toD2 ⊂ D1 ⊂ D0 based on
- linear OA(2112, 127, F2, 54) (dual of [127, 15, 55]-code), using augmented code D2 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(2105, 127, F2, 46) (dual of [127, 22, 47]-code), using augmented code D1 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(298, 127, F2, 30) (dual of [127, 29, 31]-code), using augmented code D0 for u = 7 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(21, 11, F2, 1) (dual of [11, 10, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(225, 28, F2, 15) (dual of [28, 3, 16]-code), using
- repeating each code word 4 times [i] based on linear OA(24, 7, F2, 3) (dual of [7, 3, 4]-code or 7-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- Simplex code S(3,2) [i]
- repeating each code word 4 times [i] based on linear OA(24, 7, F2, 3) (dual of [7, 3, 4]-code or 7-cap in PG(3,2)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.