Information on Result #622051
Linear OA(4104, 112, F4, 63) (dual of [112, 8, 64]-code), using construction X applied to C2 ⊂ C0 based on
- linear OA(483, 85, F4, 67) (dual of [85, 2, 68]-code), using code C2 for u = 4 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(475, 85, F4, 47) (dual of [85, 10, 48]-code), using code C0 for u = 4 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(421, 27, F4, 15) (dual of [27, 6, 16]-code), using
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
- linear OA(418, 21, F4, 15) (dual of [21, 3, 16]-code), using code C1 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(415, 21, F4, 11) (dual of [21, 6, 12]-code), using code C0 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.