Information on Result #625493
Linear OA(4130, 156, F4, 47) (dual of [156, 26, 48]-code), using repeating each code word 2 times based on linear OA(452, 78, F4, 23) (dual of [78, 26, 24]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(452, 80, F4, 23) (dual of [80, 28, 24]-code), using
- (u, u−v, u+v+w)-construction [i] based on
- linear OA(411, 26, F4, 7) (dual of [26, 15, 8]-code), using
- 4 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(415, 30, F4, 11) (dual of [30, 15, 12]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(30,4) [i]
- 4 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(415, 30, F4, 11) (dual of [30, 15, 12]-code), using
- linear OA(415, 27, F4, 11) (dual of [27, 12, 12]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(415, 30, F4, 11) (dual of [30, 15, 12]-code) (see above)
- linear OA(426, 27, F4, 23) (dual of [27, 1, 24]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(426, 27, F4, 26) (dual of [27, 1, 27]-code or 27-arc in PG(25,4)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 27 [i]
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(426, 27, F4, 26) (dual of [27, 1, 27]-code or 27-arc in PG(25,4)), using
- linear OA(411, 26, F4, 7) (dual of [26, 15, 8]-code), using
- (u, u−v, u+v+w)-construction [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.