Information on Result #625630
Linear OA(4140, 146, F4, 95) (dual of [146, 6, 96]-code), using repeating each code word 2 times based on linear OA(467, 73, F4, 47) (dual of [73, 6, 48]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(467, 75, F4, 47) (dual of [75, 8, 48]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1611, 15, F16, 11) (dual of [15, 4, 12]-code or 15-arc in PG(10,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1611, 16, F16, 11) (dual of [16, 5, 12]-code or 16-arc in PG(10,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1611, 16, F16, 11) (dual of [16, 5, 12]-code or 16-arc in PG(10,16)), using
- linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,4) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(1611, 15, F16, 11) (dual of [15, 4, 12]-code or 15-arc in PG(10,16)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.