Information on Result #625641
Linear OA(4144, 150, F4, 99) (dual of [150, 6, 100]-code), using repeating each code word 2 times based on linear OA(469, 75, F4, 49) (dual of [75, 6, 50]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(469, 77, F4, 49) (dual of [77, 8, 50]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,25]) ⊂ C([0,21]) [i] based on
- linear OA(463, 65, F4, 51) (dual of [65, 2, 52]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65 | 46−1, defining interval I = [0,25], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−15,−4,7,…,15}|+1 = 52 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(457, 65, F4, 43) (dual of [65, 8, 44]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65 | 46−1, defining interval I = [0,21], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−21,−20,…,21}|+1 = 44 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(46, 12, F4, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(12,4) [i]
- construction X applied to C([0,25]) ⊂ C([0,21]) [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.