Information on Result #627834
Linear OA(4128, 162, F4, 46) (dual of [162, 34, 47]-code), using trace code based on linear OA(1664, 81, F16, 46) (dual of [81, 17, 47]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1664, 88, F16, 46) (dual of [88, 24, 47]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,17P) ⊂ AG(F,29P) [i] based on
- linear OA(1652, 64, F16, 46) (dual of [64, 12, 47]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,17P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- linear OA(1640, 64, F16, 34) (dual of [64, 24, 35]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,29P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(1612, 24, F16, 11) (dual of [24, 12, 12]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,12P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- linear OA(1652, 64, F16, 46) (dual of [64, 12, 47]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,17P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- construction X applied to AG(F,17P) ⊂ AG(F,29P) [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.