Information on Result #630302
Linear OA(2114, 174, F2, 35) (dual of [174, 60, 36]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(3217, 29, F32, 17) (dual of [29, 12, 18]-code or 29-arc in PG(16,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3217, 32, F32, 17) (dual of [32, 15, 18]-code or 32-arc in PG(16,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(15,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3217, 32, F32, 17) (dual of [32, 15, 18]-code or 32-arc in PG(16,32)), using
- linear OA(21, 6, F2, 1) (dual of [6, 5, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(2113, 173, F2, 34) (dual of [173, 60, 35]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
2 | Linear OOA(2114, 87, F2, 2, 35) (dual of [(87, 2), 60, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
3 | Linear OOA(2114, 58, F2, 3, 35) (dual of [(58, 3), 60, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] |