Information on Result #631394
Linear OA(3196, 208, F3, 107) (dual of [208, 12, 108]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(946, 52, F9, 35) (dual of [52, 6, 36]-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OA(920, 26, F9, 17) (dual of [26, 6, 18]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(920, 27, F9, 17) (dual of [27, 7, 18]-code), using
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,9P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,9P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(920, 27, F9, 17) (dual of [27, 7, 18]-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OA(920, 26, F9, 17) (dual of [26, 6, 18]-code), using
- linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,3) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,3) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,3) [i]
- the Tetracode [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.