Information on Result #631596
Linear OA(375, 96, F3, 35) (dual of [96, 21, 36]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(2717, 24, F27, 17) (dual of [24, 7, 18]-code or 24-arc in PG(16,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2717, 27, F27, 17) (dual of [27, 10, 18]-code or 27-arc in PG(16,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(10,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2717, 27, F27, 17) (dual of [27, 10, 18]-code or 27-arc in PG(16,27)), using
- linear OA(31, 4, F3, 1) (dual of [4, 3, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(374, 95, F3, 34) (dual of [95, 21, 35]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(375, 48, F3, 2, 35) (dual of [(48, 2), 21, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
| 3 | Linear OOA(375, 32, F3, 3, 35) (dual of [(32, 3), 21, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||