Information on Result #634940

Linear OA(473, 85, F4, 47) (dual of [85, 12, 48]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
  1. linear OA(1611, 17, F16, 11) (dual of [17, 6, 12]-code or 17-arc in PG(10,16)), using
  2. linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(473, 85, F4, 46) (dual of [85, 12, 47]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(473, 85, F4, 45) (dual of [85, 12, 46]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(473, 85, F4, 44) (dual of [85, 12, 45]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(474, 86, F4, 47) (dual of [86, 12, 48]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
5Linear OA(475, 87, F4, 47) (dual of [87, 12, 48]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(472, 84, F4, 46) (dual of [84, 12, 47]-code) [i]Truncation
7Linear OA(471, 83, F4, 45) (dual of [83, 12, 46]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(470, 82, F4, 44) (dual of [82, 12, 45]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(469, 81, F4, 43) (dual of [81, 12, 44]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(467, 79, F4, 41) (dual of [79, 12, 42]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(466, 78, F4, 40) (dual of [78, 12, 41]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(465, 77, F4, 39) (dual of [77, 12, 40]-code) [i]
13Linear OOA(473, 42, F4, 2, 47) (dual of [(42, 2), 11, 48]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
14Linear OOA(473, 28, F4, 3, 47) (dual of [(28, 3), 11, 48]-NRT-code) [i]