Information on Result #634965

Linear OA(4106, 120, F4, 67) (dual of [120, 14, 68]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
  1. linear OA(1617, 24, F16, 16) (dual of [24, 7, 17]-code), using
  2. linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(4106, 120, F4, 66) (dual of [120, 14, 67]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(4107, 121, F4, 67) (dual of [121, 14, 68]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
3Linear OA(4108, 122, F4, 67) (dual of [122, 14, 68]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(4105, 119, F4, 66) (dual of [119, 14, 67]-code) [i]Truncation
5Linear OA(4104, 118, F4, 65) (dual of [118, 14, 66]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(4103, 117, F4, 64) (dual of [117, 14, 65]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(4102, 116, F4, 63) (dual of [116, 14, 64]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(4100, 114, F4, 61) (dual of [114, 14, 62]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(499, 113, F4, 60) (dual of [113, 14, 61]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(497, 111, F4, 58) (dual of [111, 14, 59]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(495, 109, F4, 56) (dual of [109, 14, 57]-code) [i]
12Linear OOA(4106, 60, F4, 2, 67) (dual of [(60, 2), 14, 68]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
13Linear OOA(4106, 40, F4, 3, 67) (dual of [(40, 3), 14, 68]-NRT-code) [i]