Information on Result #636774
Linear OA(4155, 215, F4, 71) (dual of [215, 60, 72]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6423, 43, F64, 23) (dual of [43, 20, 24]-code or 43-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6423, 64, F64, 23) (dual of [64, 41, 24]-code or 64-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(41,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6423, 64, F64, 23) (dual of [64, 41, 24]-code or 64-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,4) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,4) [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(4155, 215, F4, 70) (dual of [215, 60, 71]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
| 2 | Linear OA(4156, 216, F4, 71) (dual of [216, 60, 72]-code) | [i] | Code Embedding in Larger Space | |
| 3 | Linear OA(4154, 214, F4, 70) (dual of [214, 60, 71]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 4 | Linear OA(4153, 213, F4, 69) (dual of [213, 60, 70]-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OOA(4155, 107, F4, 2, 71) (dual of [(107, 2), 59, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
| 6 | Linear OOA(4155, 71, F4, 3, 71) (dual of [(71, 3), 58, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||