MinT - Information on Result #637232

Information on Result #637232

Linear OA(4⁹⁶, 114, F₄, 55) (dual of [114, 18, 56]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on

linear OA(64¹³, 19, F₆₄, 13) (dual of [19, 6, 14]-code or 19-arc in PG(12,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(64¹³, 64, F₆₄, 13) (dual of [64, 51, 14]-code or 64-arc in PG(12,64)), using
  - Reedâ€“Solomon code RS(51,64) [i]
linear OA(4³, 6, F₄, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- hyperoval in PG(2,Â 4) [i]
- the Hexacode [i]

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

	Result		This result only	Method
1	Linear OA(4⁹⁶, 114, F₄, 54) (dual of [114, 18, 55]-code)	[i]		Strength Reduction
2	Linear OA(4⁹⁵, 113, F₄, 54) (dual of [113, 18, 55]-code)	[i]		Truncation
3	Linear OA(4⁹³, 111, F₄, 52) (dual of [111, 18, 53]-code)	[i]
4	Linear OA(4⁹², 110, F₄, 51) (dual of [110, 18, 52]-code)	[i]
5	Linear OA(4⁹¹, 109, F₄, 50) (dual of [109, 18, 51]-code)	[i]
6	Linear OA(4⁸⁹, 107, F₄, 48) (dual of [107, 18, 49]-code)	[i]
7	Linear OOA(4⁹⁶, 57, F₄, 2, 55) (dual of [(57, 2), 18, 56]-NRT-code)	[i]		OOA Folding
8	Linear OOA(4⁹⁶, 38, F₄, 3, 55) (dual of [(38, 3), 18, 56]-NRT-code)	[i]		OOA Folding