Information on Result #637293
Linear OA(4174, 216, F4, 91) (dual of [216, 42, 92]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6422, 36, F64, 22) (dual of [36, 14, 23]-code or 36-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6422, 64, F64, 22) (dual of [64, 42, 23]-code or 64-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(42,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6422, 64, F64, 22) (dual of [64, 42, 23]-code or 64-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(4174, 216, F4, 90) (dual of [216, 42, 91]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
2 | Linear OA(4174, 216, F4, 89) (dual of [216, 42, 90]-code) | [i] | ||
3 | Linear OA(4175, 217, F4, 91) (dual of [217, 42, 92]-code) | [i] | Code Embedding in Larger Space | |
4 | Linear OA(4173, 215, F4, 90) (dual of [215, 42, 91]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
5 | Linear OA(4172, 214, F4, 89) (dual of [214, 42, 90]-code) | [i] | ||
6 | Linear OA(4171, 213, F4, 88) (dual of [213, 42, 89]-code) | [i] | ||
7 | Linear OA(4170, 212, F4, 87) (dual of [212, 42, 88]-code) | [i] | ||
8 | Linear OA(4169, 211, F4, 86) (dual of [211, 42, 87]-code) | [i] | ||
9 | Linear OA(4167, 209, F4, 84) (dual of [209, 42, 85]-code) | [i] | ||
10 | Linear OA(4176, 219, F4, 91) (dual of [219, 43, 92]-code) | [i] | Construction X with Varšamov Bound | |
11 | Linear OOA(4174, 108, F4, 2, 91) (dual of [(108, 2), 42, 92]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
12 | Linear OOA(4174, 72, F4, 3, 91) (dual of [(72, 3), 42, 92]-NRT-code) | [i] |