Information on Result #637317
Linear OA(4180, 216, F4, 99) (dual of [216, 36, 100]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6424, 36, F64, 24) (dual of [36, 12, 25]-code or 36-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6424, 64, F64, 24) (dual of [64, 40, 25]-code or 64-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(40,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6424, 64, F64, 24) (dual of [64, 40, 25]-code or 64-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(4180, 216, F4, 98) (dual of [216, 36, 99]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
2 | Linear OA(4180, 216, F4, 97) (dual of [216, 36, 98]-code) | [i] | ||
3 | Linear OA(4181, 217, F4, 99) (dual of [217, 36, 100]-code) | [i] | Code Embedding in Larger Space | |
4 | Linear OA(4179, 215, F4, 98) (dual of [215, 36, 99]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
5 | Linear OA(4178, 214, F4, 97) (dual of [214, 36, 98]-code) | [i] | ||
6 | Linear OA(4177, 213, F4, 96) (dual of [213, 36, 97]-code) | [i] | ||
7 | Linear OA(4176, 212, F4, 95) (dual of [212, 36, 96]-code) | [i] | ||
8 | Linear OA(4175, 211, F4, 94) (dual of [211, 36, 95]-code) | [i] | ||
9 | Linear OA(4173, 209, F4, 92) (dual of [209, 36, 93]-code) | [i] | ||
10 | Linear OOA(4180, 108, F4, 2, 99) (dual of [(108, 2), 36, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
11 | Linear OOA(4180, 72, F4, 3, 99) (dual of [(72, 3), 36, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] |