Information on Result #637968
Linear OA(546, 56, F5, 29) (dual of [56, 10, 30]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(259, 14, F25, 9) (dual of [14, 5, 10]-code or 14-arc in PG(8,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(259, 25, F25, 9) (dual of [25, 16, 10]-code or 25-arc in PG(8,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(16,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(259, 25, F25, 9) (dual of [25, 16, 10]-code or 25-arc in PG(8,25)), using
- linear OA(52, 4, F5, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,5) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.