Information on Result #637974
Linear OA(566, 88, F5, 35) (dual of [88, 22, 36]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(2511, 22, F25, 11) (dual of [22, 11, 12]-code or 22-arc in PG(10,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2511, 25, F25, 11) (dual of [25, 14, 12]-code or 25-arc in PG(10,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(14,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2511, 25, F25, 11) (dual of [25, 14, 12]-code or 25-arc in PG(10,25)), using
- linear OA(52, 4, F5, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,5) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(566, 88, F5, 34) (dual of [88, 22, 35]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(566, 44, F5, 2, 35) (dual of [(44, 2), 22, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |