Information on Result #638021
Linear OA(578, 92, F5, 50) (dual of [92, 14, 51]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(2516, 23, F25, 16) (dual of [23, 7, 17]-code or 23-arc in PG(15,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2516, 25, F25, 16) (dual of [25, 9, 17]-code or 25-arc in PG(15,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(9,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2516, 25, F25, 16) (dual of [25, 9, 17]-code or 25-arc in PG(15,25)), using
- linear OA(52, 4, F5, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,5) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(578, 92, F5, 49) (dual of [92, 14, 50]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
2 | Linear OA(577, 91, F5, 49) (dual of [91, 14, 50]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
3 | Linear OA(576, 90, F5, 48) (dual of [90, 14, 49]-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OA(575, 89, F5, 47) (dual of [89, 14, 48]-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OOA(578, 46, F5, 2, 50) (dual of [(46, 2), 14, 51]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
6 | Linear OOA(578, 30, F5, 3, 50) (dual of [(30, 3), 12, 51]-NRT-code) | [i] |