Information on Result #638219
Linear OA(759, 81, F7, 33) (dual of [81, 22, 34]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(4916, 27, F49, 16) (dual of [27, 11, 17]-code or 27-arc in PG(15,49)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4916, 49, F49, 16) (dual of [49, 33, 17]-code or 49-arc in PG(15,49)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(33,49) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4916, 49, F49, 16) (dual of [49, 33, 17]-code or 49-arc in PG(15,49)), using
- linear OA(71, 3, F7, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(71, s, F7, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(758, 80, F7, 32) (dual of [80, 22, 33]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
2 | Linear OOA(759, 40, F7, 2, 33) (dual of [(40, 2), 21, 34]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
3 | Linear OOA(759, 27, F7, 3, 33) (dual of [(27, 3), 22, 34]-NRT-code) | [i] |