Information on Result #638536
Linear OA(752, 64, F7, 32) (dual of [64, 12, 33]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(4910, 16, F49, 10) (dual of [16, 6, 11]-code or 16-arc in PG(9,49)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4910, 49, F49, 10) (dual of [49, 39, 11]-code or 49-arc in PG(9,49)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(39,49) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4910, 49, F49, 10) (dual of [49, 39, 11]-code or 49-arc in PG(9,49)), using
- linear OA(72, 4, F7, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,7)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(72, 7, F7, 2) (dual of [7, 5, 3]-code or 7-arc in PG(1,7)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,7) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(72, 7, F7, 2) (dual of [7, 5, 3]-code or 7-arc in PG(1,7)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.