Information on Result #638634
Linear OA(766, 72, F7, 49) (dual of [72, 6, 50]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(499, 12, F49, 9) (dual of [12, 3, 10]-code or 12-arc in PG(8,49)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(499, 49, F49, 9) (dual of [49, 40, 10]-code or 49-arc in PG(8,49)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(40,49) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(499, 49, F49, 9) (dual of [49, 40, 10]-code or 49-arc in PG(8,49)), using
- linear OA(74, 6, F7, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,7)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(74, 7, F7, 4) (dual of [7, 3, 5]-code or 7-arc in PG(3,7)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,7) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(74, 7, F7, 4) (dual of [7, 3, 5]-code or 7-arc in PG(3,7)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.