Information on Result #639570
Linear OA(872, 88, F8, 44) (dual of [88, 16, 45]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6414, 22, F64, 14) (dual of [22, 8, 15]-code or 22-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6414, 64, F64, 14) (dual of [64, 50, 15]-code or 64-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(50,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6414, 64, F64, 14) (dual of [64, 50, 15]-code or 64-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- linear OA(82, 4, F8, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.