Information on Result #639623
Linear OA(8102, 116, F8, 68) (dual of [116, 14, 69]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6422, 29, F64, 22) (dual of [29, 7, 23]-code or 29-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6422, 64, F64, 22) (dual of [64, 42, 23]-code or 64-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(42,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6422, 64, F64, 22) (dual of [64, 42, 23]-code or 64-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- linear OA(82, 4, F8, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(8102, 116, F8, 67) (dual of [116, 14, 68]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
| 2 | Linear OA(8101, 115, F8, 67) (dual of [115, 14, 68]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 3 | Linear OA(8100, 114, F8, 66) (dual of [114, 14, 67]-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OA(899, 113, F8, 65) (dual of [113, 14, 66]-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OA(897, 111, F8, 63) (dual of [111, 14, 64]-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | Linear OOA(8102, 58, F8, 2, 68) (dual of [(58, 2), 14, 69]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |