Information on Result #639809
Linear OA(872, 80, F8, 51) (dual of [80, 8, 52]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6412, 16, F64, 12) (dual of [16, 4, 13]-code or 16-arc in PG(11,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6412, 64, F64, 12) (dual of [64, 52, 13]-code or 64-arc in PG(11,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(52,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6412, 64, F64, 12) (dual of [64, 52, 13]-code or 64-arc in PG(11,64)), using
- linear OA(83, 5, F8, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,8) or 5-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 8, F8, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,8) or 8-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 8, F8, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,8) or 8-cap in PG(2,8)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.