Information on Result #639810
Linear OA(880, 90, F8, 55) (dual of [90, 10, 56]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6413, 18, F64, 13) (dual of [18, 5, 14]-code or 18-arc in PG(12,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6413, 64, F64, 13) (dual of [64, 51, 14]-code or 64-arc in PG(12,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(51,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6413, 64, F64, 13) (dual of [64, 51, 14]-code or 64-arc in PG(12,64)), using
- linear OA(83, 5, F8, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,8) or 5-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 8, F8, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,8) or 8-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 8, F8, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,8) or 8-cap in PG(2,8)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.