Information on Result #639901
Linear OA(896, 102, F8, 74) (dual of [102, 6, 75]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6414, 17, F64, 14) (dual of [17, 3, 15]-code or 17-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6414, 64, F64, 14) (dual of [64, 50, 15]-code or 64-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(50,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6414, 64, F64, 14) (dual of [64, 50, 15]-code or 64-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- linear OA(84, 6, F8, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(84, 8, F8, 4) (dual of [8, 4, 5]-code or 8-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(4,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(84, 8, F8, 4) (dual of [8, 4, 5]-code or 8-arc in PG(3,8)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.