Information on Result #639904
Linear OA(8108, 114, F8, 84) (dual of [114, 6, 85]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6416, 19, F64, 16) (dual of [19, 3, 17]-code or 19-arc in PG(15,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6416, 64, F64, 16) (dual of [64, 48, 17]-code or 64-arc in PG(15,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(48,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6416, 64, F64, 16) (dual of [64, 48, 17]-code or 64-arc in PG(15,64)), using
- linear OA(84, 6, F8, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(84, 8, F8, 4) (dual of [8, 4, 5]-code or 8-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(4,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(84, 8, F8, 4) (dual of [8, 4, 5]-code or 8-arc in PG(3,8)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.