Information on Result #639939
Linear OA(899, 105, F8, 77) (dual of [105, 6, 78]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6412, 15, F64, 12) (dual of [15, 3, 13]-code or 15-arc in PG(11,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6412, 64, F64, 12) (dual of [64, 52, 13]-code or 64-arc in PG(11,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(52,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6412, 64, F64, 12) (dual of [64, 52, 13]-code or 64-arc in PG(11,64)), using
- linear OA(85, 7, F8, 5) (dual of [7, 2, 6]-code or 7-arc in PG(4,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(85, 8, F8, 5) (dual of [8, 3, 6]-code or 8-arc in PG(4,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(85, 8, F8, 5) (dual of [8, 3, 6]-code or 8-arc in PG(4,8)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.