Information on Result #640016
Linear OA(974, 96, F9, 43) (dual of [96, 22, 44]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(8121, 32, F81, 21) (dual of [32, 11, 22]-code or 32-arc in PG(20,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8121, 81, F81, 21) (dual of [81, 60, 22]-code or 81-arc in PG(20,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(60,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8121, 81, F81, 21) (dual of [81, 60, 22]-code or 81-arc in PG(20,81)), using
- linear OA(91, 3, F9, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, s, F9, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.