Information on Result #640679
Linear OA(9146, 168, F9, 95) (dual of [168, 22, 96]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(8131, 42, F81, 31) (dual of [42, 11, 32]-code or 42-arc in PG(30,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8131, 81, F81, 31) (dual of [81, 50, 32]-code or 81-arc in PG(30,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(50,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8131, 81, F81, 31) (dual of [81, 50, 32]-code or 81-arc in PG(30,81)), using
- linear OA(92, 4, F9, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(9146, 168, F9, 94) (dual of [168, 22, 95]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
| 2 | Linear OA(9145, 167, F9, 94) (dual of [167, 22, 95]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 3 | Linear OA(9144, 166, F9, 93) (dual of [166, 22, 94]-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OA(9143, 165, F9, 92) (dual of [165, 22, 93]-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OA(9141, 163, F9, 90) (dual of [163, 22, 91]-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | Linear OOA(9146, 84, F9, 2, 95) (dual of [(84, 2), 22, 96]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
| 7 | Linear OOA(9146, 56, F9, 3, 95) (dual of [(56, 3), 22, 96]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||