Information on Result #640744
Linear OA(9114, 120, F9, 89) (dual of [120, 6, 90]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(8117, 20, F81, 17) (dual of [20, 3, 18]-code or 20-arc in PG(16,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8117, 81, F81, 17) (dual of [81, 64, 18]-code or 81-arc in PG(16,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(64,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8117, 81, F81, 17) (dual of [81, 64, 18]-code or 81-arc in PG(16,81)), using
- linear OA(94, 6, F9, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(94, 9, F9, 4) (dual of [9, 5, 5]-code or 9-arc in PG(3,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(94, 9, F9, 4) (dual of [9, 5, 5]-code or 9-arc in PG(3,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.