Information on Result #640785
Linear OA(4143, 148, F4, 103) (dual of [148, 5, 104]-code), using repeating each code word 2 times based on linear OA(469, 74, F4, 51) (dual of [74, 5, 52]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(469, 75, F4, 51) (dual of [75, 6, 52]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1612, 15, F16, 12) (dual of [15, 3, 13]-code or 15-arc in PG(11,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1612, 16, F16, 12) (dual of [16, 4, 13]-code or 16-arc in PG(11,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(4,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1612, 16, F16, 12) (dual of [16, 4, 13]-code or 16-arc in PG(11,16)), using
- linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,4) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(1612, 15, F16, 12) (dual of [15, 3, 13]-code or 15-arc in PG(11,16)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.