Information on Result #640924
Linear OA(3144, 154, F3, 86) (dual of [154, 10, 87]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(312, 22, F3, 8) (dual of [22, 10, 9]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(312, 24, F3, 8) (dual of [24, 12, 9]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(24,3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(312, 24, F3, 8) (dual of [24, 12, 9]-code), using
- linear OA(3122, 132, F3, 77) (dual of [132, 10, 78]-code), using
- construction X applied to C2 ⊂ C1 [i] based on
- linear OA(3116, 121, F3, 80) (dual of [121, 5, 81]-code), using code C2 for u = 5 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(3111, 121, F3, 71) (dual of [121, 10, 72]-code), using code C1 for u = 5 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(36, 11, F3, 5) (dual of [11, 5, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(36, 12, F3, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- extended Golay code Ge(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(36, 12, F3, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- construction X applied to C2 ⊂ C1 [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.