Information on Result #641249
Linear OA(792, 99, F7, 68) (dual of [99, 7, 69]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(735, 42, F7, 27) (dual of [42, 7, 28]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(735, 44, F7, 27) (dual of [44, 9, 28]-code), using
- 6 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(741, 50, F7, 33) (dual of [50, 9, 34]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 50 | 74−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−16,−15,…,16}|+1 = 34 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 6 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(741, 50, F7, 33) (dual of [50, 9, 34]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(735, 44, F7, 27) (dual of [44, 9, 28]-code), using
- linear OA(750, 57, F7, 40) (dual of [57, 7, 41]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 57 | 73−1, defining interval I = [0,29], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−10,−9,…,29}|+1 = 41 (BCH-bound) [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.