Information on Result #641261
Linear OA(770, 75, F7, 53) (dual of [75, 5, 54]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(75, 10, F7, 4) (dual of [10, 5, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(75, 11, F7, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F, Q+0P) ⊂ AG(F, Q+1P) [i] based on
- linear OA(74, 8, F7, 4) (dual of [8, 4, 5]-code or 8-arc in PG(3,7)), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+0P) with degQ = 3 and degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F7 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 8, using the rational function field F7(x) [i]
- linear OA(72, 8, F7, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,7)), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+1P) with degQ = 3 and degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F7 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 8 (see above)
- linear OA(71, 3, F7, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(71, s, F7, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to AG(F, Q+0P) ⊂ AG(F, Q+1P) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(75, 11, F7, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- linear OA(760, 65, F7, 48) (dual of [65, 5, 49]-code), using
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
- linear OA(754, 57, F7, 48) (dual of [57, 3, 49]-code), using code C1 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(751, 57, F7, 41) (dual of [57, 6, 42]-code), using code C0 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(76, 8, F7, 6) (dual of [8, 2, 7]-code or 8-arc in PG(5,7)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,7) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,7) [i]
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.