Information on Result #641264
Linear OA(774, 79, F7, 56) (dual of [79, 5, 57]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(79, 14, F7, 7) (dual of [14, 5, 8]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(79, 19, F7, 7) (dual of [19, 10, 8]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(710, 20, F7, 8) (dual of [20, 10, 9]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,7) [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(710, 20, F7, 8) (dual of [20, 10, 9]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(79, 19, F7, 7) (dual of [19, 10, 8]-code), using
- linear OA(760, 65, F7, 48) (dual of [65, 5, 49]-code), using
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
- linear OA(754, 57, F7, 48) (dual of [57, 3, 49]-code), using code C1 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(751, 57, F7, 41) (dual of [57, 6, 42]-code), using code C0 for u = 3 by de Boer and Brouwer [i]
- linear OA(76, 8, F7, 6) (dual of [8, 2, 7]-code or 8-arc in PG(5,7)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,7) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,7) [i]
- construction X applied to C1 ⊂ C0 [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.