Information on Result #641288

Linear OA(756, 60, F7, 47) (dual of [60, 4, 48]-code), using juxtaposition based on
  1. linear OA(76, 10, F7, 5) (dual of [10, 4, 6]-code), using
    • construction X applied to C([0,2]) ⊂ C([1,2]) [i] based on
      1. linear OA(75, 8, F7, 5) (dual of [8, 3, 6]-code or 8-arc in PG(4,7)), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 8 | 72−1, defining interval I = [0,2], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−2,−1,0,1,2}|+1 = 6 (BCH-bound) [i]
      2. linear OA(74, 8, F7, 3) (dual of [8, 4, 4]-code or 8-cap in PG(3,7)), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 8 | 72−1, defining interval I = [1,2], and minimum distance d ≥ |{1,2}| + |{−3,0}| = 4 (simple Roos-bound) [i]
      3. linear OA(71, 2, F7, 1) (dual of [2, 1, 2]-code), using
  2. linear OA(746, 50, F7, 41) (dual of [50, 4, 42]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(756, 60, F7, 46) (dual of [60, 4, 47]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OOA(756, 20, F7, 3, 47) (dual of [(20, 3), 4, 48]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding